lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Fri, 31 May 2013 23:07:24 -0400
From:	Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
To:	viro@...iv.linux.org.uk, matthew@....cx, bfields@...ldses.org
Cc:	dhowells@...hat.com, sage@...tank.com, smfrench@...il.com,
	swhiteho@...hat.com, Trond.Myklebust@...app.com,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, ceph-devel@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org, samba-technical@...ts.samba.org,
	cluster-devel@...hat.com, linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org, piastryyy@...il.com
Subject: [PATCH v1 01/11] cifs: use posix_unblock_lock instead of locks_delete_block

commit 66189be74 (CIFS: Fix VFS lock usage for oplocked files) exported
the locks_delete_block symbol. There's already an exported helper
function that provides this capability however, so make cifs use that
instead and turn locks_delete_block back into a static function.

Note that if fl->fl_next == NULL then this lock has already been through
locks_delete_block(), so we should be OK to ignore an ENOENT error here
and simply not retry the lock.

Cc: Pavel Shilovsky <piastryyy@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@...hat.com>
---
 fs/cifs/file.c     |    2 +-
 fs/locks.c         |    3 +--
 include/linux/fs.h |    5 -----
 3 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/cifs/file.c b/fs/cifs/file.c
index 48b29d2..44a4f18 100644
--- a/fs/cifs/file.c
+++ b/fs/cifs/file.c
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@ try_again:
 		rc = wait_event_interruptible(flock->fl_wait, !flock->fl_next);
 		if (!rc)
 			goto try_again;
-		locks_delete_block(flock);
+		posix_unblock_lock(file, flock);
 	}
 	return rc;
 }
diff --git a/fs/locks.c b/fs/locks.c
index cb424a4..7a02064 100644
--- a/fs/locks.c
+++ b/fs/locks.c
@@ -496,13 +496,12 @@ static void __locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
 
 /*
  */
-void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
+static void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
 {
 	lock_flocks();
 	__locks_delete_block(waiter);
 	unlock_flocks();
 }
-EXPORT_SYMBOL(locks_delete_block);
 
 /* Insert waiter into blocker's block list.
  * We use a circular list so that processes can be easily woken up in
diff --git a/include/linux/fs.h b/include/linux/fs.h
index 43db02e..b9d7816 100644
--- a/include/linux/fs.h
+++ b/include/linux/fs.h
@@ -1006,7 +1006,6 @@ extern int vfs_setlease(struct file *, long, struct file_lock **);
 extern int lease_modify(struct file_lock **, int);
 extern int lock_may_read(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count);
 extern int lock_may_write(struct inode *, loff_t start, unsigned long count);
-extern void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter);
 extern void lock_flocks(void);
 extern void unlock_flocks(void);
 #else /* !CONFIG_FILE_LOCKING */
@@ -1151,10 +1150,6 @@ static inline int lock_may_write(struct inode *inode, loff_t start,
 	return 1;
 }
 
-static inline void locks_delete_block(struct file_lock *waiter)
-{
-}
-
 static inline void lock_flocks(void)
 {
 }
-- 
1.7.1

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists