linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: Fix pll36xx_recalc

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAD025yQMn=kby1agOcV06OzFfNYFDfdok58b1EDtRb=cvB-hEg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Sat, 1 Jun 2013 08:45:36 +0530
From:	Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@...aro.org>
To:	Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:	Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
	Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
	Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
	Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>,
	Yadwinder Singh Brar <yadi.brar01@...il.com>,
	linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] clk: samsung: Fix pll36xx_recalc_rate to handle kdiv properly

Hi Doug,

Looks good to me.

On 1 June 2013 00:28, Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org> wrote:
> The KDIV value is often listed as unsigned but it needs to be treated
> as a 16-bit signed value when using it in calculations.  Fix our rate
> recalculation to do this correctly.
>
> Before doing this, I tried setting EPLL on exynos5250 to:
>   rate, m, p, s, k = 80000000, 107, 2, 4, 43691
>
> This rate is exactly from the table in the exynos5250 user manual.
>
> I read this back as 80750003 with:
>   cat /sys/kernel/debug/clk/fin_pll/fout_epll/clk_rate
>
> After this patch, it reads back as 80000003
>
>   mw 0x10020130 a06b0204
>   mw 0x10020134 0000aaab
>
> Signed-off-by: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>


Reviewed-by: Vikas Sajjan <vikas.sajjan@...aro.org>


> ---
> This patch is based upon another in-flight patch to avoid conflicts:
>   clk: samsung: Use clk->base instead of directly using clk->con0 for PLL3xxx
>   https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2629751/
>
>  drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c | 5 +++--
>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> index 01f17cf..26416bb 100644
> --- a/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> +++ b/drivers/clk/samsung/clk-pll.c
> @@ -115,7 +115,8 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>                                 unsigned long parent_rate)
>  {
>         struct samsung_clk_pll *pll = to_clk_pll(hw);
> -       u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, kdiv, pll_con0, pll_con1;
> +       u32 mdiv, pdiv, sdiv, pll_con0, pll_con1;
> +       s16 kdiv;
>         u64 fvco = parent_rate;
>
>         pll_con0 = pll_readl(pll, PLL36XX_CON0_OFFSET);
> @@ -123,7 +124,7 @@ static unsigned long samsung_pll36xx_recalc_rate(struct clk_hw *hw,
>         mdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL36XX_MDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_MDIV_MASK;
>         pdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL36XX_PDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_PDIV_MASK;
>         sdiv = (pll_con0 >> PLL36XX_SDIV_SHIFT) & PLL36XX_SDIV_MASK;
> -       kdiv = pll_con1 & PLL36XX_KDIV_MASK;
> +       kdiv = (s16)(pll_con1 & PLL36XX_KDIV_MASK);
>
>         fvco *= (mdiv << 16) + kdiv;
>         do_div(fvco, (pdiv << sdiv));
> --
> 1.8.2.1
>



--
Thanks and Regards
 Vikas Sajjan
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/