[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AAEC11.7090203@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Date: Sun, 02 Jun 2013 12:24:09 +0530
From: Raghavendra K T <raghavendra.kt@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
To: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@...p.org>
CC: gleb@...hat.com, mingo@...hat.com, x86@...nel.org,
konrad.wilk@...cle.com, hpa@...or.com, pbonzini@...hat.com,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, habanero@...ux.vnet.ibm.com,
xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com, peterz@...radead.org,
mtosatti@...hat.com, stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com,
andi@...stfloor.org, attilio.rao@...rix.com, ouyang@...pitt.edu,
gregkh@...e.de, agraf@...e.de, chegu_vinod@...com,
torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, avi.kivity@...il.com,
tglx@...utronix.de, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stephan.diestelhorst@....com,
riel@...hat.com, drjones@...hat.com,
virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org,
srivatsa.vaddagiri@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC V9 1/19] x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with
pv ticketlocks
On 06/02/2013 02:02 AM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 06/01/2013 12:21 PM, Raghavendra K T wrote:
>> x86/spinlock: Replace pv spinlocks with pv ticketlocks
>>
>> From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy.fitzhardinge@...rix.com>
> I'm not sure what the etiquette is here; I did the work while at Citrix,
> but jeremy@...p.org is my canonical email address. The Citrix address
> is dead and bounces, so is useless for anything. Probably best to
> change it.
>
Agreed.
I would change to goop address in the next posting.
I had the same doubt for Vatsa's email also. Even I am not sure about
the practice here. So had kept as is.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists