[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AC5640.5060202@linaro.org>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 10:39:28 +0200
From: Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>
To: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>
CC: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, arm@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@....com>,
Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Barry Song <baohua.song@....com>,
Daniel Walker <dwalker@...o99.com>,
Bryan Huntsman <bryanh@...eaurora.org>,
Tony Lindgren <tony@...mide.com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv6 00/11] Remove ARM local timer API
On 06/01/2013 12:16 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> On 05/31, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 05/31/2013 10:45 AM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> Comments have been light for this round so I think we're about
>>> ready to merge. John/Thomas, can you pick up these patches or
>>> shall I route them through arm-soc or something else?
>>
>>
>> So there looks to be a fair amount of additions in the ARM tree, do
>> those already have acks from Arnd/Olof/other folks? (I think I was
>> only cc'ed on the first two patches).
>
> I'm still missing acks from Kukjin and Barry.
>
>>
>> Daniel (cc'ed) has just started helping out here, and should be able
>> to review and hopefully ack or pick up the timer related
>> drivers/clocksource changes to feed to Thomas' tree. Not sure if
>> he's got them in his mailbox so you might want to resend them and
>> make sure he's CC'ed.
>>
>> If Arnd/Olof/whomever else from the arm side has acked things,
>> Daniel probably could queue the arm changes too, but it might be
>> better just to get Daniel's ack on the drivers/clocksource changes
>> and then queue things via arm-soc?
>
> Either way works for me. I would just like to see this merged
> into 3.11. I guess I will resend one more time.
Yes please, resend. I will review them.
queuing the patches via arm-soc makes sense for me, but I prefer to
review them before we decide to which tree we get them merged.
Thanks
-- Daniel
--
<http://www.linaro.org/> Linaro.org │ Open source software for ARM SoCs
Follow Linaro: <http://www.facebook.com/pages/Linaro> Facebook |
<http://twitter.com/#!/linaroorg> Twitter |
<http://www.linaro.org/linaro-blog/> Blog
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists