[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <1370219125.17798.0.camel@liguang.fnst.cn.fujitsu.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 08:25:25 +0800
From: li guang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Michael Kerrisk <mtk.manpages@...il.com>,
Dave Jones <davej@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@...nvz.org>,
Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/4] sys/reboot: boolize C_A_D
在 2013-05-31五的 16:02 -0700,Andrew Morton写道:
> On Thu, 30 May 2013 15:58:05 +0800 liguang <lig.fnst@...fujitsu.com> wrote:
>
> > --- a/include/linux/reboot.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/reboot.h
> > @@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ extern void kernel_restart(char *cmd);
> > extern void kernel_halt(void);
> > extern void kernel_power_off(void);
> >
> > -extern int C_A_D; /* for sysctl */
> > +extern bool C_A_D; /* for sysctl */
> > void ctrl_alt_del(void);
>
> This means that the pointer in kernel/sysctl.c:kern_table.data now
> points at a bool but is declared to have size sizeof(int).
>
> That happens to work with current gcc verions, but there's no rule
> which states that sizeof(bool) must equal sizeof(int).
>
> And I'm not sure that changing kern_table to use sizeof(bool) is really
> worth all the bother.
OK, got it,
Thanks!
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists