[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHp75VdUzw3wwQU5VnBGe3oPYEoHc8HO51C6VmViNF=B-bazyw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:10:26 +0300
From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To: Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
rtc-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] rtc: rtc-pcf2123: replace strict_strtoul() with kstrtoul()
On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 12:07 PM, Jingoo Han <jg1.han@...sung.com> wrote:
> The usage of strict_strtoul() is not preferred, because
> strict_strtoul() is obsolete. Thus, kstrtoul() should be
> used.
There is an issue, after fixing it take my
Reviewed-by: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-pcf2123.c
> @@ -117,9 +118,9 @@ static ssize_t pcf2123_store(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr,
>
> r = container_of(attr, struct pcf2123_sysfs_reg, attr);
>
> - if (strict_strtoul(r->name, 16, ®)
> - || strict_strtoul(buffer, 10, &val))
> - return -EINVAL;
> + ret = kstrtoul(r->name, 16, ®) || kstrtoul(buffer, 10, &val);
This is not correct. Please, split to two sequential checks.
> + if (ret)
> + return ret;
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists