linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5P64X0: Remove duplicate uncompress code

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <51AC844C.1050500@linaro.org>
Date:	Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:25:56 +0530
From:	Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
To:	Tomasz Figa <t.figa@...sung.com>
CC:	Sylwester Nawrocki <sylvester.nawrocki@...il.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org, arnd@...db.de,
	kgene.kim@...sung.com, olof@...om.net, patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] ARM: S5P64X0: Remove duplicate uncompress code

>>
>> Tomasz,
>>
>> I had somehow missed that mail.
>>
>> The patch that I have additionally makes calculation of uart_base
>> conditional on DEBUG_LL in line with the rest of the patches.
>>
>> Would you mind re-spining your patch with those changes?
>>
>> Alternately, I can take your patch and do above modifications in them.
> 
> Unfortunately I'm unlikely to find time to do it myself in nearest future, so 
> feel free to do it. Thanks.
> 
> Keep in mind, however, that this patch was a dependency of
> 
> [PATCH 0/6] Samsung watchdog support clean-up
> http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.samsung-soc/18736/focus=18951
> 
> so I would like to keep this series applicable.
> 

Sure. I will ensure that there is minimal change to the original patch
that you submitted.

> Best regards,
> 


-- 
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/