| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20130603143252.GB20252@srcf.ucam.org> Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 15:32:52 +0100 From: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> To: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de> Cc: Linux EFI <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>, Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>, Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>, X86-ML <x86@...nel.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de> Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] EFI 1:1 mapping On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 10:11:48AM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote: > On Sun, Jun 02, 2013 at 11:56:20PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote: > > I've just run Windows 8 under a hacked up copy of OVMF that dumps > > the data passed to SetVirtualAddressMap. It seems that Windows *is* > > mapping the runtime services to higher addresses - so presumably the > > 1:1 mapping is in addition to the virtual mapping. > > But but, once we call SetVirtualAddressMap with the set of addresses of > the runtime services, only those can be used after, right? If so, we > can't have both (this is at least my understanding)... We can only pass one set of addresses to SetVirtualAddressMap(), but it doesn't seem like there's any intrinsic reason we can't the runtime regions mapped to multiple virtual addresses. -- Matthew Garrett | mjg59@...f.ucam.org -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists