[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1370274140-26420-4-git-send-email-jiang.liu@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:42:15 +0800
From: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Nitin Gupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@...hat.com>
Cc: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [RFC PATCH v1 3/8] zram: use zram->lock to protect zram_free_page() in swap free notify path
zram_free_page() is protected by down_write(&zram->lock) when called by
zram_bvec_write(), but there's no such protection when called by
zram_slot_free_notify(), which may cause wrong states to zram object.
So enhance zram_slot_free_notify() to acquire writer lock on zram->lock
before calling zram_free_page().
Signed-off-by: Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>
---
drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
index ee6b67d..0738f6c 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/zram/zram_drv.c
@@ -582,7 +582,9 @@ static void zram_slot_free_notify(struct block_device *bdev,
struct zram *zram;
zram = bdev->bd_disk->private_data;
+ down_write(&zram->lock);
zram_free_page(zram, index);
+ up_write(&zram->lock);
zram_stat64_inc(zram, &zram->stats.notify_free);
}
--
1.8.1.2
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists