linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130603155940.GA6714@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 11:59:40 -0400
From:	Vivek Goyal <vgoyal@...hat.com>
To:	Michael Holzheu <holzheu@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc:	Zhang Yanfei <zhangyanfei.yes@...il.com>,
	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	HATAYAMA Daisuke <d.hatayama@...fujitsu.com>,
	Jan Willeke <willeke@...ibm.com>,
	Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@...ibm.com>,
	Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kexec@...ts.infradead.org,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] kdump/mmap: Fix mmap of /proc/vmcore for s390

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 03:27:18PM +0200, Michael Holzheu wrote:

[..]
> > If not, how would remap_pfn_range() work with HSA region when
> > /proc/vmcore is mmaped()?
> 
> I am no memory management expert, so I discussed that with Martin
> Schwidefsky (s390 architecture maintainer). Perhaps something like
> the following could work:
> 
> After vmcore_mmap() is called the HSA pages are not initially mapped in
> the page tables. So when user space accesses those parts
> of /proc/vmcore, a fault will be generated. We implement a mechanism
> that in this case the HSA is copied to a new page in the page cache and
> a mapping is created for it. Since the page is allocated in the page
> cache, it can be released afterwards by the kernel when we get memory
> pressure.
> 
> Our current idea for such an implementation:
> 
> * Create new address space (struct address_space) for /proc/vmcore.
> * Implement new vm_operations_struct "vmcore_mmap_ops" with
>   new vmcore_fault() ".fault" callback for /proc/vmcore.
> * Set vma->vm_ops to vmcore_mmap_ops in mmap_vmcore().
> * The vmcore_fault() function will get a new page cache page,
>   copy HSA page to page cache page add it to vmcore address space.
>   To see how this could work, we looked into the functions
>   filemap_fault() in "mm/filemap.c" and relay_buf_fault() in
>   "kernel/relay.c".
> 
> What do you think?

I am not mm expert either but above proposal sounds reasonable to me.

So remap_pfn_range() call will go in arch dependent code so that arch
can decide which range can be mapped right away and which ranges will
be filed in when fault happens? I am assuming that s390 will map
everything except for pfn between 0 and HSA_SIZE.

And regular s390 kdump will map everyting right away and will not
have to rely on fault mechanism?

Thanks
Vivek
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/