linux-kernel - Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64/xen: introduce CONFIG

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:43:29 +0100
From:	Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To:	Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>
Cc:	Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>,
	"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
	"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>,
	Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64/xen: introduce CONFIG_XEN and
 hypercall.S on ARM64

On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:37:35PM +0100, Ian Campbell wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 17:25 +0100, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 04:33:44PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/xen/hypercall.S
> > ...
> > > +/*
> > > + * The Xen hypercall calling convention is very similar to the ARM AEBI
> > > + * procedure calling convention: the first paramter is passed in x0, the
> > > + * second in x1, the third in x2 and the fourth in x3. Considering that
> > > + * Xen hypercalls have 5 arguments at most, the fifth paramter is passed
> 
>                                                           parameter
> 
> > > + * in rx, differently from the procedure calling convention of using the
> 
>           ^x4 not rx
> 
> > > + * stack for that case.
> > 
> > You may want to use the AArch64 ABI here where parameters are passed in
> > x0-x7, return in x0.
> 
> I think that is actually what we are doing (up to 5 arguments), the
> "Considering that ..." bit at the end is a left over of the 32 bit
> version I think.

Yes, only the comment needs updating.

-- 
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/