linux-kernel - [PATCH v2 0/4] proc: first

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130603190640.GA11481@redhat.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:06:40 +0200
From:	Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
To:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc:	"Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
	Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
	Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v2 0/4] proc: first_tid() fix/cleanup

Hello.

next_thread() should be avoided, probably next_tid() is the
only "valid" user.

But now we have another reason to avoid (and probably even kill)
it, we are going to replace or fix while_each_thread(), almost
every lockless usage is wrong.

Changes:

	1/4: Update the changelog, do not move the comment.

	2/4: No changes.

	3/4: Update the comment following the explanations from
	     Eric.

	     Eric pointed that get_proc_task() without rcu lock
	     can trigger the (bogus) warning. Extract the similar
	     check from pid_delete_dentry() into the new helper
	     and use it instead.

	     I didn't dare to preserve his ack, but the only change
	     is the new proc_inode_is_dead() helper and

		- if (pid_task(proc_pid(inode))
		+ if (proc_inode_is_dead(inode))

	     in proc_task_readdir().

	4/4: New.

Oleg.

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/