| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 15:06:23 -0700
From: ebiederm@...ssion.com (Eric W. Biederman)
To: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.cz>,
Sergey Dyasly <dserrg@...il.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/4] proc: simplify proc_task_readdir/first_tid paths
Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com> writes:
> proc_task_readdir() does not really need "leader", first_tid()
> has to revalidate it anyway. Just pass proc_pid(inode) to
> first_tid() instead, it can do pid_task(PIDTYPE_PID) itself
> and read ->group_leader only if necessary.
>
> The patch also extracts the "inode is dead" code
> from pid_delete_dentry(dentry) into the new trivial helper,
> proc_inode_is_dead(inode), proc_task_readdir() uses it to return
> -ENOENT if this dir was removed. This is a bit racy, but the race
> is very inlikely and the getdents() after openndir() can see the
> empty "." + ".." dir only once.
This version looks good. I especially like the factoring out of
proc_inode_is_dead, that makes the purpose of that code much clearer.
Reviewed-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>
> Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
> ---
> fs/proc/base.c | 53 ++++++++++++++++++++++-------------------------------
> 1 files changed, 22 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/proc/base.c b/fs/proc/base.c
> index bed1096..5e0e02f 100644
> --- a/fs/proc/base.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/base.c
> @@ -1652,13 +1652,18 @@ int pid_revalidate(struct dentry *dentry, unsigned int flags)
> return 0;
> }
>
> +static inline bool proc_inode_is_dead(struct inode *inode)
> +{
> + return !proc_pid(inode)->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID].first;
> +}
> +
> int pid_delete_dentry(const struct dentry *dentry)
> {
> /* Is the task we represent dead?
> * If so, then don't put the dentry on the lru list,
> * kill it immediately.
> */
> - return !proc_pid(dentry->d_inode)->tasks[PIDTYPE_PID].first;
> + return proc_inode_is_dead(dentry->d_inode);
> }
>
> const struct dentry_operations pid_dentry_operations =
> @@ -3173,34 +3178,35 @@ out_no_task:
> * In the case of a seek we start with the leader and walk nr
> * threads past it.
> */
> -static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct task_struct *leader,
> - int tid, int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> +static struct task_struct *first_tid(struct pid *pid, int tid,
> + int nr, struct pid_namespace *ns)
> {
> - struct task_struct *pos;
> + struct task_struct *pos, *task;
>
> rcu_read_lock();
> - /* Attempt to start with the pid of a thread */
> + task = pid_task(pid, PIDTYPE_PID);
> + if (!task)
> + goto fail;
> +
> + /* Attempt to start with the tid of a thread */
> if (tid && (nr > 0)) {
> pos = find_task_by_pid_ns(tid, ns);
> - if (pos && (pos->group_leader == leader))
> + if (pos && same_thread_group(pos, task))
> goto found;
> }
>
> /* If nr exceeds the number of threads there is nothing todo */
> - if (nr && nr >= get_nr_threads(leader))
> - goto fail;
> - /* It could be unhashed before we take rcu lock */
> - if (!pid_alive(leader))
> + if (nr && nr >= get_nr_threads(task))
> goto fail;
>
> /* If we haven't found our starting place yet start
> * with the leader and walk nr threads forward.
> */
> - pos = leader;
> + pos = task = task->group_leader;
> do {
> if (nr-- <= 0)
> goto found;
> - } while_each_thread(leader, pos);
> + } while_each_thread(task, pos);
> fail:
> pos = NULL;
> goto out;
> @@ -3247,26 +3253,13 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
> {
> struct dentry *dentry = filp->f_path.dentry;
> struct inode *inode = dentry->d_inode;
> - struct task_struct *leader = NULL;
> struct task_struct *task;
> - int retval = -ENOENT;
> ino_t ino;
> int tid;
> struct pid_namespace *ns;
>
> - task = get_proc_task(inode);
> - if (!task)
> - goto out_no_task;
> - rcu_read_lock();
> - if (pid_alive(task)) {
> - leader = task->group_leader;
> - get_task_struct(leader);
> - }
> - rcu_read_unlock();
> - put_task_struct(task);
> - if (!leader)
> - goto out_no_task;
> - retval = 0;
> + if (proc_inode_is_dead(inode))
> + return -ENOENT;
>
> switch ((unsigned long)filp->f_pos) {
> case 0:
> @@ -3289,7 +3282,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
> ns = filp->f_dentry->d_sb->s_fs_info;
> tid = (int)filp->f_version;
> filp->f_version = 0;
> - for (task = first_tid(leader, tid, filp->f_pos - 2, ns);
> + for (task = first_tid(proc_pid(inode), tid, filp->f_pos - 2, ns);
> task;
> task = next_tid(task), filp->f_pos++) {
> tid = task_pid_nr_ns(task, ns);
> @@ -3302,9 +3295,7 @@ static int proc_task_readdir(struct file * filp, void * dirent, filldir_t filldi
> }
> }
> out:
> - put_task_struct(leader);
> -out_no_task:
> - return retval;
> + return 0;
> }
>
> static int proc_task_getattr(struct vfsmount *mnt, struct dentry *dentry, struct kstat *stat)
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists