[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <201306040018.33236.heiko@sntech.de>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 00:18:32 +0200
From: Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Cc: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 3/3] clk: dt: binding for basic divider clock
Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:10 schrieb Mike Turquette:
> Devicetree binding for the basic clock divider, plus the setup function
> to register the clock. Based on the existing fixed-clock binding.
>
> Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
> ---
[...]
> +/**
> + * of_div_clk_setup() - Setup function for simple div rate clock
> + */
> +void of_divider_clk_setup(struct device_node *node)
> +{
> + struct clk *clk;
> + const char *clk_name = node->name;
> + void __iomem *reg;
> + const char *parent_name;
> + u8 clk_divider_flags = 0;
> + u8 mask = 0;
> + u8 shift = 0;
in the mux-clock these 3 are unsigned long and u32 types ... what is correct?
> + struct clk_div_table *table;
> +
> + of_property_read_string(node, "clock-output-names", &clk_name);
> +
> + parent_name = of_clk_get_parent_name(node, 0);
> +
> + reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u8(node, "mask", &mask)) {
> + pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__, node->name);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + if (of_property_read_u8(node, "shift", &shift))
> + pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero for %s\n",
> + __func__, node->name);
same here ... mux reads u32
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one"))
> + clk_divider_flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_ONE_BASED;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_power_of_two"))
> + clk_divider_flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_POWER_OF_TWO;
> +
> + if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_allow_zero"))
> + clk_divider_flags |= CLK_DIVIDER_ALLOW_ZERO;
> +
> + table = of_clk_get_div_table(node);
> + if (IS_ERR(table))
> + return;
> +
> + clk = clk_register_divider_table(NULL, clk_name,
> + parent_name, 0,
> + reg, shift, mask,
> + clk_divider_flags, table,
> + NULL);
this causes trouble, as the divider clock code above still requires a width
instead of a mask. I remember talk about this going to change separately, but
couldn't find anything of the sort in linux-next.
> +
> + if (!IS_ERR(clk))
> + of_clk_add_provider(node, of_clk_src_simple_get, clk);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(of_divider_clk_setup);
> +CLK_OF_DECLARE(divider_clk, "divider-clock", of_divider_clk_setup);
> +#endif
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists