[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130603163633.e392dffdacc316b490b12a26@canb.auug.org.au>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2013 16:36:33 +1000
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
To: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
Cc: Linux-Next <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for May 30
Hi Geert,
On Thu, 30 May 2013 10:07:48 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>
> The following defconfigs fail without anything useful in the log:
> - at91sam9g20_defconfig
> - at91sam9261_defconfig
> - at91sam9260_defconfig
>
> A manual run reveals why:
> Can't find default configuration "arch/arm/configs/at91sam9g20_defconfig"!
>
> This is due to the merge of several config files:
>
> commit b3f442b0eedbc20b5ce3f4a96530588d14901199
> Author: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
> Date: Wed May 15 17:19:21 2013 +0200
>
> ARM: at91: udpate defconfigs
>
> Merge 9g20 with 9260 and 9g10 with 9261 as those SoCs can run from the same
> kernel even in non DT world.
>
> Fix the sam9261ek to allow 9g10 and sam9261 to compile together.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>
> Signed-off-by: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Thanks for letting me know. I have stopped those three configs from
being built.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell sfr@...b.auug.org.au
Content of type "application/pgp-signature" skipped
Powered by blists - more mailing lists