lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAKohpo=EyudEW+EX=b7=Wp-7ceqjVksDTwwSJf77_LNFaaNL3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:25:02 +0530
From:	Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
To:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
Cc:	Stratos Karafotis <stratosk@...aphore.gr>,
	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, cpufreq@...r.kernel.org,
	linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] cpufreq: ondemand: Change the calculation of target frequency

Sent half written mail.. sorry.. will continue from where I left.

On 3 June 2013 12:21, Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:

> So, obviously the calculations aren't the same..

Now, this is how I understood these two different variables:
- cpuinfo.max_freq: maximum frequency (in kHz) which is
supported by this CPU
- policy->max: Maximum frequency forced by user or governor

When somebody sets policy->max, he expects cpufreq core to
use the range between min and max as the slope cpufreq core
has and adjust its frequencies accordingly..

Don't know if I am right or wrong :(
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ