linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] clk: dt: binding for basic multiplexor clock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAPtuhTitiDVBTLF==je9_Ydks5OCqM1cDv-UwPsGkkgwEj6VWQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Mon, 3 Jun 2013 23:14:58 -0700
From:	Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
To:	Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de>
Cc:	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 2/3] clk: dt: binding for basic multiplexor clock

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:39 PM, Heiko Stübner <heiko@...ech.de> wrote:
> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:15:45 schrieb Heiko Stübner:
>> Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 22:07:22 schrieb Mike Turquette:
>> > Quoting Heiko Stübner (2013-06-03 12:33:19)
>> >
>> > > Hi Mike,
>> > >
>> > > I think it's a multiplexEr clock in the patch title, and see below
>> >
>> > Doh, you are right.  But "xor" is so much cooler looking than "xer"...
>> >
>> > > Am Montag, 3. Juni 2013, 19:53:09 schrieb Mike Turquette:
>> > > > Device Tree binding for the basic clock multiplexor, plus the setup
>> > > > function to register the clock.  Based on the existing fixed-clock
>> > > > binding.
>> > > >
>> > > > Also relocate declaration of of_fixed_factor_clk_setup to keep things
>> > > > tidy.
>> > > >
>> > > > Signed-off-by: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
>> > >
>> > > [...]
>> > >
>> > > > +
>> > > > +     reg = of_iomap(node, 0);
>> > > > +     pr_err("%s: reg is 0x%p\n", __func__, reg);
>> > > > +
>> > > > +     if (of_property_read_u32(node, "mask", &mask)) {
>> > > > +             pr_err("%s: missing mask property for %s\n", __func__,
>> > > > node->name); +             return;
>> > > > +     }
>> > > > +
>> > > > +     if (of_property_read_u32(node, "shift", &shift))
>> > > > +             pr_debug("%s: missing shift property defaults to zero
>> > > > for %s\n", +                             __func__, node->name);
>> > > > +
>> > > > +     if (of_property_read_bool(node, "index_one"))
>> > > > +             clk_mux_flags |= CLK_MUX_INDEX_ONE;
>> > > > +
>> > > > +     clk = clk_register_mux_table(NULL, clk_name, parent_names,
>> > > > num_parents, +                     0, reg, 0, mask, clk_mux_flags,
>> > > >
>> > >                       ^- should probably be shift
>> > >
>> > > Otherwise looks cool and I'm currently trying it with my Rockchip code.
>> >
>> > Right again.  My test platform seems to not shift the mask at all so
>> > this did not cause a visible bug for me.
>>
>> I'm currently converting my rockchip stuff to it, as it would solve a lot
>> of problems with the numerous clock types I'm defining just to put the
>> shift and mask values somewhere.
>>
>> So lets see if anything more turns up ;-)
>
> yep ... of_mux_clk_setup is quite talkative ... there are quite some (debug-?)
> pr_errs in it ;-)
>

Yes I realized that after sending.  Hopefully not too many curse words
in the trace messages.  Will remove for v2.

Regards,
Mike

>
> Heiko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/