lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:17:26 +0800
From:	Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
To:	Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
Cc:	linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mgorman@...e.de,
	tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com, minchan@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 5/6] mm: vmscan: batch shrink_page_list() locking operations

On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 4:02 AM, Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net> wrote:
> +/*
> + * pages come in here (via remove_list) locked and leave unlocked
> + * (on either ret_pages or free_pages)
> + *
> + * We do this batching so that we free batches of pages with a
> + * single mapping->tree_lock acquisition/release.  This optimization
> + * only makes sense when the pages on remove_list all share a
> + * page_mapping().  If this is violated you will BUG_ON().
> + */
> +static int __remove_mapping_batch(struct list_head *remove_list,
> +                                 struct list_head *ret_pages,
> +                                 struct list_head *free_pages)
> +{
> +       int nr_reclaimed = 0;
> +       struct address_space *mapping;
> +       struct page *page;
> +       LIST_HEAD(need_free_mapping);
> +
> +       if (list_empty(remove_list))
> +               return 0;
> +
> +       mapping = page_mapping(lru_to_page(remove_list));
> +       spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> +       while (!list_empty(remove_list)) {
> +               page = lru_to_page(remove_list);
> +               BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
> +               BUG_ON(page_mapping(page) != mapping);
> +               list_del(&page->lru);
> +
> +               if (!__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
> +                       unlock_page(page);
> +                       list_add(&page->lru, ret_pages);
> +                       continue;
> +               }
> +               list_add(&page->lru, &need_free_mapping);
> +       }
> +       spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
> +
While reclaiming pages, can we open ears upon IRQ controller,
if the page list length is over 10, or even 20?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists