lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdVsJVP5--nzEABMS+epY2vkR7G40OT=b43vtiifZTcMHg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 09:14:52 +0200
From:	Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:	Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
	Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
	Hans-Christian Egtvedt <egtvedt@...fundet.no>,
	Lennox Wu <lennox.wu@...il.com>, linux-c6x-dev@...ux-c6x.org,
	Cris <linux-cris-kernel@...s.com>, linux@...ts.openrisc.net,
	HÃ¥vard Skinnemoen <hskinnemoen@...il.com>,
	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: Exotic architecture fixes

On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 3:28 AM, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
> On Sun, 2 Jun 2013 21:39:38 +0200 Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> On Tue, May 28, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> > On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:09 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven
>> > <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
>> >> I created a branch where I collected several exotic architecture fixes
>> >> (and a few
>> >> other trivial fixes):
>> >>
>> >>   git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/geert/linux-m68k.git exotic-arch-fixes
>> >>
>> >> Several of these have been ack'ed (cfr. *-indicators below).
>> >> If you reject any of the commits, please scream.
>> >> If you want to take any of them yourself, please do so.
>> >>
>> >> I intend to merge this into my for-next branch after the release of v3.10-rc4,
>> >> and ask Linus to pull after the release of v3.10-rc5.
>>
>> I merged this in the for-next branch of my repo.
>
> Surely, your for-linus branch would have been a better choice.  And then
> maybe merge that into your for-next branch if you really needed these
> fixes to continue with m68k work?

An updated version is now in for-linus, as Linus has pulled the m68k
content on the
old for-linus branch.

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

--
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ