[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AD4808.6020507@intel.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 09:51:04 +0800
From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
To: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
CC: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
Morten Rasmussen <morten.rasmussen@....com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Preeti U Murthy <preeti@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>, Rik van Riel <riel@...hat.com>,
Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Subject: [DISCUSSION] removing variety rq->cpu_load ?
resend with a new subject.
> Peter,
>
> I just tried to remove the variety rq.cpu_load, by the following patch.
> Because forkexec_idx and busy_idx are all zero, after the patch system just keep cpu_load[0]
> and remove other values.
> I tried the patch base 3.10-rc3 and latest tip/sched/core with benchmark dbench,tbench,
> aim7,hackbench. and oltp of sysbench. Seems performance doesn't change clear.
> So, for my tested machines, core2, NHM, SNB, with 2 or 4 CPU sockets, and above tested
> benchmark. We are fine to remove the variety cpu_load.
> Don't know if there some other concerns on other scenarios.
>
> ---
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/fair.c b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> index 590d535..f0ca983 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/fair.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/fair.c
> @@ -4626,7 +4626,7 @@ static inline void update_sd_lb_stats(struct lb_env *env,
> if (child && child->flags & SD_PREFER_SIBLING)
> prefer_sibling = 1;
>
> - load_idx = get_sd_load_idx(env->sd, env->idle);
> + load_idx = 0; //get_sd_load_idx(env->sd, env->idle);
>
> do {
> int local_group;
>
>
--
Thanks
Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists