[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <000001ce60c9$622de130$2689a390$%choi@samsung.com>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 11:15:29 +0900
From: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
To: 'Jonghwan Choi' <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org, 'Dave Kleikamp' <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>,
'Vahram Martirosyan' <vahram.martirosyan@...uxtesting.org>
Subject: [PATCH 3.9-stable] jfs: Several bugs in jfs_freeze() and
jfs_unfreeze()
This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
it?
------------------
From: "Vahram Martirosyan <vmartirosyan@...il.com>"
commit e9b376671910d105c5e61103111b96209c729529 upstream
The mentioned functions do not pay attention to the error codes returned
by the functions updateSuper(), lmLogInit() and lmLogShutdown(). It brings
to system crash later when writing to log.
The patch adds corresponding code to check and return the error codes
and to print correct error messages in case of errors.
Found by Linux File System Verification project (linuxtesting.org).
Signed-off-by: Vahram Martirosyan <vahram.martirosyan@...uxtesting.org>
Reviewed-by: Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>
Signed-off-by: Dave Kleikamp <dave.kleikamp@...cle.com>
Signed-off-by: Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>
---
fs/jfs/super.c | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
diff --git a/fs/jfs/super.c b/fs/jfs/super.c
index 1a543be..2502d39 100644
--- a/fs/jfs/super.c
+++ b/fs/jfs/super.c
@@ -611,11 +611,28 @@ static int jfs_freeze(struct super_block *sb)
{
struct jfs_sb_info *sbi = JFS_SBI(sb);
struct jfs_log *log = sbi->log;
+ int rc = 0;
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
txQuiesce(sb);
- lmLogShutdown(log);
- updateSuper(sb, FM_CLEAN);
+ rc = lmLogShutdown(log);
+ if (rc) {
+ jfs_error(sb, "jfs_freeze: lmLogShutdown failed");
+
+ /* let operations fail rather than hang */
+ txResume(sb);
+
+ return rc;
+ }
+ rc = updateSuper(sb, FM_CLEAN);
+ if (rc) {
+ jfs_err("jfs_freeze: updateSuper failed\n");
+ /*
+ * Don't fail here. Everything succeeded except
+ * marking the superblock clean, so there's really
+ * no harm in leaving it frozen for now.
+ */
+ }
}
return 0;
}
@@ -627,13 +644,18 @@ static int jfs_unfreeze(struct super_block *sb)
int rc = 0;
if (!(sb->s_flags & MS_RDONLY)) {
- updateSuper(sb, FM_MOUNT);
- if ((rc = lmLogInit(log)))
- jfs_err("jfs_unlock failed with return code %d",
rc);
- else
- txResume(sb);
+ rc = updateSuper(sb, FM_MOUNT);
+ if (rc) {
+ jfs_error(sb, "jfs_unfreeze: updateSuper failed");
+ goto out;
+ }
+ rc = lmLogInit(log);
+ if (rc)
+ jfs_error(sb, "jfs_unfreeze: lmLogInit failed");
+out:
+ txResume(sb);
}
- return 0;
+ return rc;
}
static struct dentry *jfs_do_mount(struct file_system_type *fs_type,
--
1.7.9.5
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists