linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC -tip 0/6] perf: IRQ-bound performance events

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 4 Jun 2013 12:14:36 +0200
From:	Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@...hat.com>
To:	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, x86@...nel.org,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...stprotocols.net>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC -tip 0/6] perf: IRQ-bound performance events

On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:38:02AM +0200, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > Oops, the most interesting part did not make it in. Very sorry :) Here:
> > 
> > # ./tools/perf/perf stat -I 8 -a -e L1-dcache-load-misses:k hwclock --test
> > Mon 03 Jun 2013 09:32:49 AM EDT  -0.719514 seconds
> > 
> >  Performance counter stats for process id '8':
> > 
> >                447 L1-dcache-load-misses                                       
> 
> I think that is very much expected; except in the case where you spend
> _all_ your time in IRQ handlers, they'll pretty much always miss l1
> cache.

The emphasis was on the fact it indeed could be measured for a particular ISR ;)

-- 
Regards,
Alexander Gordeev
agordeev@...hat.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/