[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CACxGe6vYKq0QpeXHzgMabjkY4x9rVbm7OpXs6boAntVvPK=vrA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 4 Jun 2013 14:35:39 +0100
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...retlab.ca>
To: Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org>
Cc: Khalid Aziz <khalid@...ehiking.org>,
Matthew Garrett <mjg@...hat.com>,
Lv Zheng <lv.zheng@...el.com>, Len Brown <len.brown@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
Jason Wessel <jason.wessel@...driver.com>,
Feng Tang <feng.tang@...el.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Mailing List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
x86@...nel.org, platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Al Stone <al.stone@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/2] ACPI: Add early console framework for DBGP/DBG2.
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 2:23 PM, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@...f.ucam.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 11:53:56AM +0100, Grant Likely wrote:
>
>> Matthew, can you point me at the license Microsoft is using for the
>> DBG2 table? I can download the document from Microsoft's site without
>> seeing any reference to it being licensed only for BIOS implementers.
>> All I see is a "this document is provided 'as-is', blah blah blah"
>> blurb at the beginning of the document. It may be that Microsoft has
>> changed the license on this document in the last 6 months.
>
> The DBGP spec still seems to have the restrictive license, but I can't
> find it on DBG2.
Thanks Matthew. I'll follow up with Microsoft on DBGP.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists