[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AE2980.6010005@linaro.org>
Date: Tue, 04 Jun 2013 10:53:04 -0700
From: John Stultz <john.stultz@...aro.org>
To: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
CC: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...eaurora.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org" <linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
"arm@...nel.org" <arm@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <Catalin.Marinas@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv2 0/6] Make ARM's sched_clock generic + 64 bit friendly
On 06/04/2013 09:09 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 04, 2013 at 01:19:48AM +0100, John Stultz wrote:
>> On 06/01/2013 11:39 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
>>> This is mostly a resend of a patch series I sent a little over a month
>>> ago. I've reordered the patches so that John can pick up the first three
>>> and get a generic sched_clock layer without having to take the 64 bit
>>> patches. The last three patches add 64 bit support and move the architected
>>> timers on ARM64 and ARM to use it.
>>
>> Yea, so from the initial look over it, I think I'm happy with queuing
>> the first three patches, although I'd like to get some acks from arm
>> folks on at least the first two, just so no one is surprised with it
>> going through the -tip tree.
> The first two patches are pretty simple so, FWIW, you can add my ack on those:
>
> Acked-by: Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>
Thanks! Added to the commits.
-john
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists