linux-kernel - [ 112/184] epoll: prevent missed events on EPOLL_CTL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:	Tue, 04 Jun 2013 19:23:22 +0200
From:	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
To:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc:	Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>,
	Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>, Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
	Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
	Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>,
	Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
	Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>,
	David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>,
	Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>,
	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Andreas Voellmy <andreas.voellmy@...e.edu>,
	netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
	Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
	Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>,
	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
	Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
Subject: [ 112/184] epoll: prevent missed events on EPOLL_CTL_MOD

2.6.32-longterm review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>

commit 128dd1759d96ad36c379240f8b9463e8acfd37a1 upstream.

EPOLL_CTL_MOD sets the interest mask before calling f_op->poll() to
ensure events are not missed.  Since the modifications to the interest
mask are not protected by the same lock as ep_poll_callback, we need to
ensure the change is visible to other CPUs calling ep_poll_callback.

We also need to ensure f_op->poll() has an up-to-date view of past
events which occured before we modified the interest mask.  So this
barrier also pairs with the barrier in wq_has_sleeper().

This should guarantee either ep_poll_callback or f_op->poll() (or both)
will notice the readiness of a recently-ready/modified item.

This issue was encountered by Andreas Voellmy and Junchang(Jason) Wang in:
http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel/1408782/

Signed-off-by: Eric Wong <normalperson@...t.net>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@...co.com>
Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc: Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
Cc: Davide Libenzi <davidel@...ilserver.org>
Cc: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
Cc: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...radead.org>
Cc: David Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Cc: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Andreas Voellmy <andreas.voellmy@...e.edu>
Tested-by: "Junchang(Jason) Wang" <junchang.wang@...e.edu>
Cc: netdev@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
[bwh: Backported to 3.2: adjust context]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@...adent.org.uk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Willy Tarreau <w@....eu>
---
 fs/eventpoll.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++++-
 1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/eventpoll.c b/fs/eventpoll.c
index ff57421..83fbd64 100644
--- a/fs/eventpoll.c
+++ b/fs/eventpoll.c
@@ -1183,10 +1183,30 @@ static int ep_modify(struct eventpoll *ep, struct epitem *epi, struct epoll_even
 	 * otherwise we might miss an event that happens between the
 	 * f_op->poll() call and the new event set registering.
 	 */
-	epi->event.events = event->events;
+	epi->event.events = event->events; /* need barrier below */
 	epi->event.data = event->data; /* protected by mtx */
 
 	/*
+	 * The following barrier has two effects:
+	 *
+	 * 1) Flush epi changes above to other CPUs.  This ensures
+	 *    we do not miss events from ep_poll_callback if an
+	 *    event occurs immediately after we call f_op->poll().
+	 *    We need this because we did not take ep->lock while
+	 *    changing epi above (but ep_poll_callback does take
+	 *    ep->lock).
+	 *
+	 * 2) We also need to ensure we do not miss _past_ events
+	 *    when calling f_op->poll().  This barrier also
+	 *    pairs with the barrier in wq_has_sleeper (see
+	 *    comments for wq_has_sleeper).
+	 *
+	 * This barrier will now guarantee ep_poll_callback or f_op->poll
+	 * (or both) will notice the readiness of an item.
+	 */
+	smp_mb();
+
+	/*
 	 * Get current event bits. We can safely use the file* here because
 	 * its usage count has been increased by the caller of this function.
 	 */
-- 
1.7.12.2.21.g234cd45.dirty



--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/