[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130605072106.GC7303@mtj.dyndns.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 00:21:06 -0700
From: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/3] workqueue: code refine in wqattrs_equal()
On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 03:14:04PM +0800, Michael Wang wrote:
> code refine to save some line.
>
> CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Michael Wang <wangyun@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>
> ---
> kernel/workqueue.c | 5 ++---
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/kernel/workqueue.c b/kernel/workqueue.c
> index ee8e29a..5fd4791 100644
> --- a/kernel/workqueue.c
> +++ b/kernel/workqueue.c
> @@ -3417,9 +3417,8 @@ static bool wqattrs_equal(const struct workqueue_attrs *a,
> {
> if (a->nice != b->nice)
> return false;
> - if (!cpumask_equal(a->cpumask, b->cpumask))
> - return false;
> - return true;
> +
> + return cpumask_equal(a->cpumask, b->cpumask);
I don't know. I kinda like the current form because we can add new
attributes easily without modifying existing lines. The suggested
patch is frivolous. It doesn't really improve anything.
Thanks.
--
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists