[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AEE7C0.9060206@biophys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:24:48 +1200
From: schmitz <schmitz@...phys.uni-duesseldorf.de>
To: Chen Gang <gang.chen@...anux.com>
CC: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Greg Ungerer <gerg@...inux.org>, schmitz@...ian.org,
Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>,
Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
linux-m68k <linux-m68k@...ts.linux-m68k.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux-Arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
Thorsten Glaser <tg@...bsd.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arch: m68k: include: asm: the 3rd parameter of 'insl'
and 'outsl' need '<< 2'
Chen,
> On 06/03/2013 06:48 PM, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
>
>>>>>> This _only_ applies to use of insl/outsl macros in parport_pc.h, which
>>>>>> is only used by Q40 on m68k. I see no reason to change anything in io.h
>>>>>> to cope with this warning.
>>>>>>
>
> I guess your meaning is :
>
> ----------------------------diff begin----------------------------------
>
> diff --git a/arch/m68k/include/asm/parport.h b/arch/m68k/include/asm/parport.h
> index 5ea75e6..dd1672a 100644
> --- a/arch/m68k/include/asm/parport.h
> +++ b/arch/m68k/include/asm/parport.h
> @@ -11,9 +11,20 @@
> #ifndef _ASM_M68K_PARPORT_H
> #define _ASM_M68K_PARPORT_H 1
>
> +#ifdef CONFIG_Q40 /* for Q40, need redefine insl/outsl */
> +
> +#ifdef insl
> +#undef insl
> +#endif
> #define insl(port,buf,len) isa_insb(port,buf,(len)<<2)
> +
> +#ifdef outsl
> +#undef outsl
> +#endif
> #define outsl(port,buf,len) isa_outsb(port,buf,(len)<<2)
>
> +#endif /* CONFIG_Q40 */
> +
> /* no dma, or IRQ autoprobing */
> static int parport_pc_find_isa_ports (int autoirq, int autodma);
> static int parport_pc_find_nonpci_ports (int autoirq, int autodma)
>
> ----------------------------diff end------------------------------------
>
No need for the #ifdef CONFIG_Q40 - Q40 is the only m68k subarch that
builds the parport_pc module (which includes parport.h), IIRC. Is that
correct, Thorsten?
>>>> It sounds reasonable.
>>>>
>>>> And excuse me, could you provide the related link directly ? I don't
>>>> know how to see the detail of 'loom.20130511T171757-995@...t.gmane.org'.
>>>>
>> http://www.spinics.net/lists/linux-m68k/msg06041.html
>>
>
> OK, thanks. And sorry for replying late (during these days, I have to
> do another things, and almost can not connect net).
>
>
Thanks indeed for the link, Geert. I haven't yet had time to test
whether the io.h patch would interfere with Atari IDE or other drivers's
use of these macros - maybe this weekend.
> It seems already has another related patch for it, and it is just
> applying.
>
> So need I send it again ?
>
>
I think Thorsten submitted a patch to that effect? If so, yours should
not be necessary.
Regards,
Michael
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists