linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 15/15] OF: remove #ifdef from linux/of

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <18275402.lrMAtEkNSk@wuerfel>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2013 14:13:23 +0200
From:	Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:	Rob Herring <robherring2@...il.com>
Cc:	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>,
	patches@...ts.linaro.org, Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@...nel.crashing.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 15/15] OF: remove #ifdef from linux/of_platform.h

On Tuesday 04 June 2013 17:24:51 Rob Herring wrote:
> 
> Right. I get all that. You still have to go add inlines if you want to make:
> 
> if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_OF))
>     of_foo();
> 
> just be:
> 
> of_foo();
> 
> There are situations for both and only inlines cover both cases. I
> don't see a reason we would want to allow the first case and not allow
> the second case. I am tired of taking patches adding the inlines 1 by
> 1, so perhaps we need to refactor the OF headers to better separate
> core infrastructure includes vs. driver only includes if that is
> really a concern.

Ok, fair enough. Putting internal declarations into a local header
file would be best of course.

	Arnd
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/