[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130605132117.GK8758@arm.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:21:17 +0100
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@...citrix.com>
Cc: "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com" <xen-devel@...ts.xensource.com>,
Will Deacon <Will.Deacon@....com>,
"Ian.Campbell@...rix.com" <Ian.Campbell@...rix.com>,
"konrad.wilk@...cle.com" <konrad.wilk@...cle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 5/5] arm64/xen: introduce CONFIG_XEN and hypercall.S
on ARM64
On Mon, Jun 03, 2013 at 05:51:53PM +0100, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> On Mon, 3 Jun 2013, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> > Otherwise, the series looks good. How do you plan to upstream this?
>
> Good question.
> Traditionally Xen stuff goes to Linus directly via one of the Xen trees
> (Konrad's or mine), but since this is the very first Xen patch series
> for arm64 if you prefer I can submit a pull request to you instead.
> Just let me know, I am happy either way.
I can take the first series and subsequent merges can go via the Xen
tree (KVM has a similar approach).
> In any case, are you OK with sending it upstream during the next merge
> window?
Yes, if I get a pull request in time ;)
--
Catalin
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists