lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AF3BD7.5070001@canonical.com>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2013 15:23:35 +0200
From:	Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@...onical.com>
To:	Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>
CC:	dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
	linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
	airlied@...ux.ie, daniel.vetter@...ll.ch,
	kyungmin.park@...sung.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH 1/2] dma-buf: add importer private data to attachment

Op 31-05-13 10:54, Seung-Woo Kim schreef:
> dma-buf attachment has only exporter private data, but importer private data
> can be useful for importer especially to re-import the same dma-buf.
> To use importer private data in attachment of the device, the function to
> search attachment in the attachment list of dma-buf is also added.
>
> Signed-off-by: Seung-Woo Kim <sw0312.kim@...sung.com>
> ---
>  drivers/base/dma-buf.c  |   31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>  include/linux/dma-buf.h |    4 ++++
>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> index 08fe897..a1eaaf2 100644
> --- a/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> +++ b/drivers/base/dma-buf.c
> @@ -259,6 +259,37 @@ err_attach:
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_attach);
>  
>  /**
> + * dma_buf_get_attachment - Get attachment with the device from dma_buf's
> + * attachments list
> + * @dmabuf:	[in]	buffer to find device from.
> + * @dev:	[in]	device to be found.
> + *
> + * Returns struct dma_buf_attachment * attaching the device; may return
> + * negative error codes.
> + *
> + */
> +struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_get_attachment(struct dma_buf *dmabuf,
> +						  struct device *dev)
> +{
> +	struct dma_buf_attachment *attach;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!dmabuf || !dev))
> +		return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> +
> +	mutex_lock(&dmabuf->lock);
> +	list_for_each_entry(attach, &dmabuf->attachments, node) {
> +		if (attach->dev == dev) {
> +			mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
> +			return attach;
> +		}
> +	}
> +	mutex_unlock(&dmabuf->lock);
> +
> +	return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(dma_buf_get_attachment);
NAK in any form..

Spot the race condition between dma_buf_get_attachment and dma_buf_attach....

~Maarten

--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ