linux-kernel - Re: [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's unfreeze

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <0000013f14aba791-b53199dd-c805-4644-9777-3916950e83e4-000000@email.amazonses.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:09:21 +0000
From:	Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>
To:	JoonSoo Kim <js1304@...il.com>
cc:	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
	Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>,
	LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	RT <linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
	Clark Williams <clark@...hat.com>,
	Pekka Enberg <penberg@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [RT LATENCY] 249 microsecond latency caused by slub's
 unfreeze_partials() code.

On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, JoonSoo Kim wrote:

> @@ -2495,7 +2495,8 @@ static void __slab_free(struct kmem_cache *s,
> struct page *page,
>                 new.inuse--;
>                 if ((!new.inuse || !prior) && !was_frozen) {
>
> -                       if (!kmem_cache_debug(s) && !prior)
> +                       if (!kmem_cache_debug(s) && !prior &&
> +                               node_match(page,
> cpu_to_node(smp_processor_id())))
>

Would increase the overhead of the free path. cpu_to_node? Use
numa_node_id().
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/