[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <51AF4A24.2020606@sr71.net>
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 07:24:36 -0700
From: Dave Hansen <dave@...1.net>
To: Hillf Danton <dhillf@...il.com>
CC: Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mgorman@...e.de, tim.c.chen@...ux.intel.com
Subject: Re: [v5][PATCH 5/6] mm: vmscan: batch shrink_page_list() locking
operations
On 06/05/2013 12:28 AM, Hillf Danton wrote:
>>>> >> > + mapping = page_mapping(lru_to_page(remove_list));
>>>> >> > + spin_lock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>>>> >> > + while (!list_empty(remove_list)) {
>>>> >> > + page = lru_to_page(remove_list);
>>>> >> > + BUG_ON(!PageLocked(page));
>>>> >> > + BUG_ON(page_mapping(page) != mapping);
>>>> >> > + list_del(&page->lru);
>>>> >> > +
>>>> >> > + if (!__remove_mapping(mapping, page)) {
>>>> >> > + unlock_page(page);
>>>> >> > + list_add(&page->lru, ret_pages);
>>>> >> > + continue;
>>>> >> > + }
>>>> >> > + list_add(&page->lru, &need_free_mapping);
>>>> >> > + }
>>>> >> > + spin_unlock_irq(&mapping->tree_lock);
>>>> >> > +
>>> >> While reclaiming pages, can we open ears upon IRQ controller,
>>> >> if the page list length is over 10, or even 20?
>> >
>> > At the moment, it implicitly could be bounded by SWAP_CLUSTER_MAX and
> Could we reclaim a THP currently?
No, it would be split first.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists