linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] dmatest: do not allow to interrupt ongoing tests

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAHp75Vdv=ybs7jJ1k6rfPoxAyEmhtMr8CSaSrdU+1dMDSr5x+A@mail.gmail.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 20:33:51 +0300
From:	Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
To:	Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@....de>
Cc:	Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
	Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
	Vinod Koul <vinod.koul@...el.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"viresh.kumar@...aro.org" <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
	"djbw@...com" <djbw@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dmatest: do not allow to interrupt ongoing tests

On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 8:25 PM, Guennadi Liakhovetski
<g.liakhovetski@....de> wrote:
> On Wed, 5 Jun 2013, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 08:11:07AM +0100, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2013-05-24 at 23:55 +0200, Guennadi Liakhovetski wrote:
>> > > On Thu, 23 May 2013, Andy Shevchenko wrote:
>> > >
>> > > > When user interrupts ongoing transfers the dmatest may end up with console
>> > > > lockup, oops, or data mismatch. This patch prevents user to abort any ongoing
>> > > > test.
>> > >
>> > > Personally I would be against such a change. What about interrupting the
>> > > test with rmmod?
>> > >  Is it still possible after this your patch or not? If not
>> > > - this doesn't seem like a good idea to me. Why don't we just fix those
>> > > bugs, that you're describing?
>> >
>> > The behaviour of the module is returned to the same page by this patch
>> > as it was before (w/o debugfs).
>> >
>> > The user can interrupt tests by rmmod, but it will take time up to
>> > timeout.
>> >
>> > I appreciate if you can do a deeper analysis of what happened in
>> > case Will reported.
>>
>> Did this query hold up the application of this patch? I'd really like to see
>> *something* in 3.10, otherwise dmatest will be broken.

Will, Vinod is the slave DMA subsystem maintainer, I hope he could
shed a light on your concerns.
Actually, does it work as expected if you didn't run modprobe -r ?

> Not from me, no. I just expressed a doubt, the author thinks there is no
> problem, and I have no capacity atm to try to verify it, so, my query
> shouldn't be considered a nak.

Guennadi, anyway, thanks for your opinion.

Vinod, have you chance to try last patch?

--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/