linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power Controller (SPC) support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1370455713.3496.22.camel@linaro1.home>
Date:	Wed, 05 Jun 2013 19:08:33 +0100
From:	"Jon Medhurst (Tixy)" <tixy@...aro.org>
To:	Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:	linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
	devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org,
	Nicolas Pitre <nicolas.pitre@...aro.org>,
	Samuel Ortiz <sameo@...ux.intel.com>,
	Pawel Moll <pawel.moll@....com>,
	Sudeep KarkadaNagesha <Sudeep.KarkadaNagesha@....com>,
	Achin Gupta <achin.gupta@....com>,
	Amit Kucheria <amit.kucheria@...aro.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 2/2] drivers: mfd: vexpress: add Serial Power
 Controller (SPC) support

On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 12:46 +0100, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
[...]
> +static const struct of_device_id vexpress_spc_ids[] __initconst = {
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,vexpress-spc,v2p-ca15_a7" },
> +	{ .compatible = "arm,vexpress-spc" },
> +	{},
> +};
> +
> +static int __init vexpress_spc_init(void)
> +{
> +	int ret;
> +	struct device_node *node = of_find_matching_node(NULL,
> +							 vexpress_spc_ids);

To allow for devices without an SPC we should check for !node here and
bail out, otherwise we get an ugly message from the WARN_ON further
down. I see this on RTSM, and multiplatform kernels would suffer this as
well.

Even if the ugly warning wasn't there, it still seems cleaner to me to
have a proper check for an absent spc node.

> +	info = kzalloc(sizeof(*info), GFP_KERNEL);
> +	if (!info) {
> +		pr_err("%s: unable to allocate mem\n", __func__);
> +		return -ENOMEM;
> +	}
> +	info->cur_req_type = INVALID_TYPE;
> +
> +	info->baseaddr = of_iomap(node, 0);
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info->baseaddr)) {
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		goto mem_free;
> +	}
> +
> +	info->irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(node, 0);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!info->irq)) {
> +		ret = -ENXIO;
> +		goto unmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + PWC_STATUS);
> +
> +	ret = request_irq(info->irq, vexpress_spc_irq_handler,
> +		IRQF_DISABLED | IRQF_TRIGGER_HIGH | IRQF_ONESHOT,
> +		"arm-spc", info);
> +
> +	if (ret) {
> +		pr_err("IRQ %d request failed\n", info->irq);
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto unmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	info->a15_clusid = readl_relaxed(info->baseaddr + A15_CONF) & 0xf;
> +
> +	vexpress_spc_config_bridge = vexpress_config_bridge_register(
> +			node, &vexpress_spc_config_bridge_info);
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON(!vexpress_spc_config_bridge)) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto unmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	opp_func = vexpress_config_func_get(vexpress_spc_config_bridge, "opp");
> +	perf_func =
> +		vexpress_config_func_get(vexpress_spc_config_bridge, "perf");
> +
> +	if (!opp_func || !perf_func) {
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto unmap;
> +	}
> +
> +	if (vexpress_spc_populate_opps(0) || vexpress_spc_populate_opps(1)) {
> +		if (info->irq)
> +			free_irq(info->irq, info);
> +		pr_err("failed to build OPP table\n");
> +		ret = -ENODEV;
> +		goto unmap;
> +	}
> +	/*
> +	 * Multi-cluster systems may need this data when non-coherent, during
> +	 * cluster power-up/power-down. Make sure it reaches main memory:
> +	 */
> +	sync_cache_w(info);
> +	sync_cache_w(&info);
> +	pr_info("vexpress-spc loaded at %p\n", info->baseaddr);
> +	return 0;
> +
> +unmap:
> +	iounmap(info->baseaddr);
> +
> +mem_free:
> +	kfree(info);
> +	return ret;
> +}
> +
> +static bool __init __vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void);
> +static bool (*spc_check_loaded)(void) = &__vexpress_spc_check_loaded;
> +
> +static bool __init __vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void)
> +{
> +	if (vexpress_spc_load_result == -EAGAIN)
> +		vexpress_spc_load_result = vexpress_spc_init();
> +	spc_check_loaded = &vexpress_spc_initialized;
> +	return vexpress_spc_initialized();
> +}
> +
> +/*
> + * Function exported to manage early_initcall ordering.
> + * SPC code is needed very early in the boot process
> + * to bring CPUs out of reset and initialize power
> + * management back-end. After boot swap pointers to
> + * make the functionality check available to loadable
> + * modules, when early boot init functions have been
> + * already freed from kernel address space.
> + */
> +bool vexpress_spc_check_loaded(void)
> +{
> +	return spc_check_loaded();
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(vexpress_spc_check_loaded);
> +
> +static int __init vexpress_spc_early_init(void)
> +{
> +	__vexpress_spc_check_loaded();
> +	return vexpress_spc_load_result;
> +}
> +early_initcall(vexpress_spc_early_init);
> +MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
> +MODULE_DESCRIPTION("Serial Power Controller (SPC) support");
[...]

-- 
Tixy


--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/