linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up and add DT support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130605192240.GA5647@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 12:22:40 -0700
From:	Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com>
Cc:	Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
	linux-pcmcia@...ts.infradead.org, linux@...inikbrodowski.net,
	Fabio Porcedda <fabio.porcedda@...il.com>,
	"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
	<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
	Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
	Ludovic Desroches <ludovic.desroches@...el.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	manabian@...il.com, laurent.navet@...il.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/7] pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up and add DT support

On Wed, Jun 05, 2013 at 12:04:26PM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> On 20/04/2013 00:54, Greg Kroah-Hartman :
> >On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 10:51:23AM +0200, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
> >>On 04/17/2013 10:39 AM, Fabio Porcedda :
> >>>On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 12:40 PM, Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@...el.com> wrote:
> >>>>These patches clean up at91_cf a bit and add DT bindings.
> >>>>It is based on a previous series from Joachim Eastwood and other cleanup
> >>>>patches by Fabio and Laurent.
> >>>>I have collected them together as they are lying around for some time.
> >>>>
> >>>>Please tell me if It can go through PCMCIA tree or if Andrew or Greg can
> >>>>take them.
> >>>>Note that they are not bug fixes, so you can stack them for 3.10.
> >>>>
> >>>>Thanks for your help, best regards.
> >>>>
> >>>>v2: add 2 more cleanup patches:
> >>>>         - move to module_platform_driver_probe()
> >>>>         - little trivial indentation fix
> >>>>
> >>>>Fabio Porcedda (1):
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: use module_platform_driver_probe()
> >>>>
> >>>>Joachim Eastwood (5):
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: fix gpio_get_value in at91_cf_get_status
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: convert to dev_ print functions
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: use devm_ functions for allocations
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: clean up header includes
> >>>>   pcmcia: at91_cf: add support for DT
> >>>>
> >>>>Laurent Navet (1):
> >>>>   pcmcia/trivial: at91_cf: fix checkpatch error
> >>>>
> >>>>  .../devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt      |  19 +++
> >>>>  drivers/pcmcia/Kconfig                             |   2 +-
> >>>>  drivers/pcmcia/at91_cf.c                           | 176 ++++++++++-----------
> >>>>  3 files changed, 108 insertions(+), 89 deletions(-)
> >>>>  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ata/atmel-at91_cf.txt
> >>>>
> >>>>--
> >>>>1.8.0
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>>Ping?
> >>
> >>Andrew, Greg, can you please take this series?
> >>
> >>Here is the post on lkml:
> >>https://lkml.org/lkml/2013/3/21/246
> >>
> >>Here is the first patch in patchwork (1/7):
> >>https://patchwork.kernel.org/patch/2312691/
> >>
> >>Tell me if I can do something else to make this applied upstream...
> >
> >The PCMCIA maintainer should take these, not me.
> 
> I know Greg, but this patch series is still not taken by anyone 3
> months after its first submission and after several requests by both
> Fabio and myself...
> 
> The series is still applying on linux-next today... Maybe it can go
> via Andrew, then...

I can take them through my char/misc driver tree if it's been that long
of a delay, care to resend them to me?

thanks,

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/