[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130605195953.GD30420@console-pimps.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 20:59:53 +0100
From: Matt Fleming <matt@...sole-pimps.org>
To: Matthew Garrett <matthew.garrett@...ula.com>
Cc: "Fleming, Matt" <matt.fleming@...el.com>, joeyli <jlee@...e.com>,
"rja@....com" <rja@....com>, "mingo@...nel.org" <mingo@...nel.org>,
"torvalds@...ux-foundation.org" <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"bp@...en8.de" <bp@...en8.de>, "jkosina@...e.cz" <jkosina@...e.cz>,
"linux-efi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-efi@...r.kernel.org>,
"x86@...nel.org" <x86@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"hpa@...ux.intel.com" <hpa@...ux.intel.com>,
"akpm@...ux-foundation.org" <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"oneukum@...e.de" <oneukum@...e.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Modify UEFI anti-bricking code
On Wed, 05 Jun, at 04:08:39PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 16:59 +0100, Matt Fleming wrote:
>
> > + /* clean DUMMY object */
> > + efi.set_variable(efi_dummy_name, &EFI_DUMMY_GUID, 0, 0, NULL);
>
> Hm. Actually, is that going to work? From the spec:
>
> If a preexisting variable is rewritten with different attributes,
> SetVariable()shall not modify the variable and shall return
> EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER.
>
> So I think we probably need to fix the attributes to NV|RT|BS for both
> this call and the one in query_variable_store. We should probably also
> only do the workaround if the NV bit is set in the original query.
Yeah, that looks wrong.
Joey, care to resend an updated patch?
--
Matt Fleming, Intel Open Source Technology Center
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists