[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAErSpo4AFxSqUfxbw60B8XVk3XxtYfRcLyWDy=yPb0fURV=BQg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:14:38 -0600
From: Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
To: Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com>
Cc: Yinghai Lu <yinghai@...nel.org>, Jiang Liu <jiang.liu@...wei.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Gu Zheng <guz.fnst@...fujitsu.com>,
Toshi Kani <toshi.kani@...com>,
Myron Stowe <myron.stowe@...hat.com>,
Yijing Wang <wangyijing@...wei.com>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3, part1 06/10] PCI: make PCI host bridge/bus creating
and destroying logic symmetric
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 7:48 AM, Jiang Liu <liuj97@...il.com> wrote:
> This patch makes PCI host bridge/bus creating and destroying logic
> symmetric by using device_initialize()/device_add()/device_del()/put_device()
> pairs as discussed in thread at:
> http://comments.gmane.org/gmane.linux.kernel.pci/22073
>
> It also fixes a bug in error recovery path in pci_create_root_bus()
> which may kfree() an in-use host bridge object.
Can you split out the bug fix into a separate patch, in case it's
something we want to backport by itself? I'd do it myself, but I
didn't understand at a glance what the problem was.
Bjorn
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists