linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] NFSv4.1 Fix a pNFS session draining deadlock

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20130605201710.GC13713@kroah.com>
Date:	Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:17:10 -0700
From:	Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:	"Myklebust, Trond" <Trond.Myklebust@...app.com>
Cc:	Jonghwan Choi <jhbird.choi@...sung.com>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"stable@...r.kernel.org" <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
	"Adamson, Andy" <William.Adamson@...app.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3.9-stable] NFSv4.1 Fix a pNFS session draining deadlock

On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:23:05AM +0000, Myklebust, Trond wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-05-27 at 09:23 +0900, Jonghwan Choi wrote:
> > This patch looks like it should be in the 3.9-stable tree, should we apply
> > it?
> 
> It's a condition which appears to be extremely rare: so far, we've only
> seen it during extreme stress testing at NetApp. For that reason, and
> because it is NFSv4.1 only, I'm inclined to wait until we see real-world
> cases before making it a stable patch.

Thanks for letting us know, I'll not apply it unless you say we should
later on.

greg k-h
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/