[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAD=FV=UqLaAWh6pxAXXjcEu+D5ByoCB1V7F8Z2h-Ddq9ObS_6w@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 13:56:52 -0700
From: Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
To: Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
Cc: Kukjin Kim <kgene.kim@...sung.com>,
Thomas Abraham <thomas.abraham@...aro.org>,
Simon Glass <sjg@...omium.org>,
linux-samsung-soc <linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org>,
Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>,
Russell King <linux@....linux.org.uk>,
Ben Dooks <ben-linux@...ff.org>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ARM: samsung: avoid racy early printk at bootup
Olof,
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:15 PM, Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net> wrote:
> This seems to be caused by not calling iotable_ini() in exynos_init_io()
> when a device tree is passed into the kernel, thus not setting up the
> mapping for the UART in that case.
>
> I think the solution is instead to map the uart earlier. The window of
> exposure is still there, but much smaller (and similar to how it always
> has been).
>
> In current upstream, if there is no map_io mach_desc entry at all,
> debug_ll_io_init() will be called on all platforms. Seems appropriate
> to call that explicitly before of_scan_flat_dt() in exynos_init_io()
> in this case.
Oh. Ummm, right. Yes, debug_ll_io_init() is exactly what's needed
here instead of all the complexity of what I proposed. New patch
coming shortly. Thanks! :)
-Doug
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists