[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20130605213224.923715222@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:33:48 -0700
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>,
Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Subject: [ 061/127] module: dont unlink the module until weve removed all exposure.
3.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
commit 944a1fa01266aa9ace607f29551b73c41e9440e9 upstream.
Otherwise we get a race between unload and reload of the same module:
the new module doesn't see the old one in the list, but then fails because
it can't register over the still-extant entries in sysfs:
[ 103.981925] ------------[ cut here ]------------
[ 103.986902] WARNING: at fs/sysfs/dir.c:536 sysfs_add_one+0xab/0xd0()
[ 103.993606] Hardware name: CrownBay Platform
[ 103.998075] sysfs: cannot create duplicate filename '/module/pch_gbe'
[ 104.004784] Modules linked in: pch_gbe(+) [last unloaded: pch_gbe]
[ 104.011362] Pid: 3021, comm: modprobe Tainted: G W 3.9.0-rc5+ #5
[ 104.018662] Call Trace:
[ 104.021286] [<c103599d>] warn_slowpath_common+0x6d/0xa0
[ 104.026933] [<c1168c8b>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xab/0xd0
[ 104.031986] [<c1168c8b>] ? sysfs_add_one+0xab/0xd0
[ 104.037000] [<c1035a4e>] warn_slowpath_fmt+0x2e/0x30
[ 104.042188] [<c1168c8b>] sysfs_add_one+0xab/0xd0
[ 104.046982] [<c1168dbe>] create_dir+0x5e/0xa0
[ 104.051633] [<c1168e78>] sysfs_create_dir+0x78/0xd0
[ 104.056774] [<c1262bc3>] kobject_add_internal+0x83/0x1f0
[ 104.062351] [<c126daf6>] ? kvasprintf+0x46/0x60
[ 104.067231] [<c1262ebd>] kobject_add_varg+0x2d/0x50
[ 104.072450] [<c1262f07>] kobject_init_and_add+0x27/0x30
[ 104.078075] [<c1089240>] mod_sysfs_setup+0x80/0x540
[ 104.083207] [<c1260851>] ? module_bug_finalize+0x51/0xc0
[ 104.088720] [<c108ab29>] load_module+0x1429/0x18b0
We can teardown sysfs first, then to be sure, put the state in
MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED so it's ignored while we deconstruct it.
Reported-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Tested-by: Veaceslav Falico <vfalico@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>
Cc: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
kernel/module.c | 13 +++++++++----
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/module.c
+++ b/kernel/module.c
@@ -1861,12 +1861,12 @@ static void free_module(struct module *m
{
trace_module_free(mod);
- /* Delete from various lists */
- mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
- stop_machine(__unlink_module, mod, NULL);
- mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
mod_sysfs_teardown(mod);
+ /* We leave it in list to prevent duplicate loads, but make sure
+ * that noone uses it while it's being deconstructed. */
+ mod->state = MODULE_STATE_UNFORMED;
+
/* Remove dynamic debug info */
ddebug_remove_module(mod->name);
@@ -1879,6 +1879,11 @@ static void free_module(struct module *m
/* Free any allocated parameters. */
destroy_params(mod->kp, mod->num_kp);
+ /* Now we can delete it from the lists */
+ mutex_lock(&module_mutex);
+ stop_machine(__unlink_module, mod, NULL);
+ mutex_unlock(&module_mutex);
+
/* This may be NULL, but that's OK */
unset_module_init_ro_nx(mod);
module_free(mod, mod->module_init);
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists