[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <1370414192-5830-3-git-send-email-jasowang@redhat.com>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 14:36:25 +0800
From: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
To: davem@...emloft.net, mst@...hat.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: sergei.shtylyov@...entembedded.com,
Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Subject: [net-next rfc V3 2/9] macvtap: do not add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read
There's no need to add self to waitqueue if doing a nonblock read. This could
help to avoid the spinlock contention.
Signed-off-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
---
drivers/net/macvtap.c | 7 +++++--
1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/net/macvtap.c b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
index 5e485e3..8949631 100644
--- a/drivers/net/macvtap.c
+++ b/drivers/net/macvtap.c
@@ -845,7 +845,9 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
ssize_t ret = 0;
while (len) {
- prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait, TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
+ if (!noblock)
+ prepare_to_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait,
+ TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
/* Read frames from the queue */
skb = skb_dequeue(&q->sk.sk_receive_queue);
@@ -867,7 +869,8 @@ static ssize_t macvtap_do_read(struct macvtap_queue *q, struct kiocb *iocb,
break;
}
- finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
+ if (!noblock)
+ finish_wait(sk_sleep(&q->sk), &wait);
return ret;
}
--
1.7.1
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists