[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20130605232943.GA4790@xanatos>
Date: Wed, 5 Jun 2013 16:29:43 -0700
From: Sarah Sharp <sarah.a.sharp@...ux.intel.com>
To: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
gregkh <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>, Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
Hi Alex,
Thanks for updating this patch against current kernels. However, I'm
really behind on patch review because of OPW, so I'm sorry, but I may
not be able to review this until next week.
Sarah Sharp
On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 09:31:58PM +0800, Alex Shi wrote:
> On 05/28/2013 09:39 PM, Alex Shi wrote:
> > On 05/24/2013 10:54 AM, Alex Shi wrote:
> >>
> >> Ops, I just find a old patch left on my laptop. and it still works on latest
> >> Linus tree. I don't remember there is a reasonable excuse to reject this patch.
> >>
> >> So, anyone like to pick it up?
> >
> > Ping ...
>
> Is there someone like to give a bit comments on this patch?
> >>
> >> ------
> >> From 6ae1b9e71f9b14be5774ae9c1b4cf57cd4e747ac Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> >> Date: Mon, 11 Jun 2012 15:10:18 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH] usb/xhci: unify parameter of xhci_msi_irq
> >>
> >> According to Felipe and Alan's comments the second parameter of irq
> >> handler should be 'void *' not a specific structure pointer.
> >> So change it.
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Alex Shi <alex.shi@...el.com>
> >> Acked-by: Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>
> >> ---
> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c | 2 +-
> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.c | 4 ++--
> >> drivers/usb/host/xhci.h | 2 +-
> >> 3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >> index 23b4aef..cc8a52f 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci-ring.c
> >> @@ -2479,7 +2479,7 @@ hw_died:
> >> return IRQ_HANDLED;
> >> }
> >>
> >> -irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, struct usb_hcd *hcd)
> >> +irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, void *hcd)
> >> {
> >> return xhci_irq(hcd);
> >> }
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> >> index afdc73e..f7d40c1 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.c
> >> @@ -215,7 +215,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msi(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> >> return ret;
> >> }
> >>
> >> - ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, (irq_handler_t)xhci_msi_irq,
> >> + ret = request_irq(pdev->irq, xhci_msi_irq,
> >> 0, "xhci_hcd", xhci_to_hcd(xhci));
> >> if (ret) {
> >> xhci_dbg(xhci, "disable MSI interrupt\n");
> >> @@ -287,7 +287,7 @@ static int xhci_setup_msix(struct xhci_hcd *xhci)
> >>
> >> for (i = 0; i < xhci->msix_count; i++) {
> >> ret = request_irq(xhci->msix_entries[i].vector,
> >> - (irq_handler_t)xhci_msi_irq,
> >> + xhci_msi_irq,
> >> 0, "xhci_hcd", xhci_to_hcd(xhci));
> >> if (ret)
> >> goto disable_msix;
> >> diff --git a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> >> index de3d6e3..737ef54 100644
> >> --- a/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> >> +++ b/drivers/usb/host/xhci.h
> >> @@ -1710,7 +1710,7 @@ int xhci_resume(struct xhci_hcd *xhci, bool hibernated);
> >>
> >> int xhci_get_frame(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
> >> irqreturn_t xhci_irq(struct usb_hcd *hcd);
> >> -irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, struct usb_hcd *hcd);
> >> +irqreturn_t xhci_msi_irq(int irq, void *hcd);
> >> int xhci_alloc_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev);
> >> void xhci_free_dev(struct usb_hcd *hcd, struct usb_device *udev);
> >> int xhci_alloc_tt_info(struct xhci_hcd *xhci,
> >>
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Thanks
> Alex
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists