[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:32:18 +0530
From: Tushar Behera <tushar.behera@...aro.org>
To: Mike Turquette <mturquette@...aro.org>
CC: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-samsung-soc@...r.kernel.org,
kgene.kim@...sung.com, thomas.abraham@...aro.org,
patches@...aro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Clock changes for supporting CPUFreq on Exynos5250
On 05/30/2013 04:12 AM, Mike Turquette wrote:
> Quoting Tushar Behera (2013-05-27 22:38:44)
>> On 05/17/2013 11:25 AM, Tushar Behera wrote:
>>> With the use of common clock framework, CPUFreq driver on EXYNOS5250 now
>>> requires a few changes in clocks.
>>>
>>> Tested on Exynos5250 based Arndale board.
>>> The patches are based on v3.10-rc1.
>>>
>>> Tushar Behera (2):
>>> clk: exynos5250: Update cpufreq related clocks for EXYNOS5250
>>> clk: exynos5250: Add sclk_mpll to the parent list of mout_cpu clock
>>>
>>> drivers/clk/samsung/clk-exynos5250.c | 8 ++++----
>>> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Any comments on this series?
>>
>
> I've taken both patches into clk-next.
>
Would it be possible for you to queue them for 3.10-rc? These two
patches are sufficient for cpufreq to work on Arndale board. It would be
nice to have cpufreq working on 3.10 kernel.
> Regards,
> Mike
>
>> --
>> Tushar Behera
--
Tushar Behera
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists