[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 12:55:47 +0100
From: Grant Likely <grant.likely@...aro.org>
To: Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu>
Cc: Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD <plagnioj@...osoft.com>,
Michal Simek <michal.simek@...inx.com>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Rob Herring <rob.herring@...xeda.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: Export of_irq_count for using in modules
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 9:39 AM, Michal Simek <monstr@...str.eu> wrote:
> On 06/06/2013 10:29 AM, Jean-Christophe PLAGNIOL-VILLARD wrote:
>> On 18:45 Fri 31 May , Michal Simek wrote:
>>> ok. good to know. Btw: Let's return to my origin point why not to
>>> export of_irq_count for modules?
>>> Or opposite question if platform_get_resource is correct way
>>> why to export of_irq_to_resource for modules?
>>
>> for old ppc drivers that are not converted yet to pdev
>>
>> if you can do so just use pdev resource I should have fix the pb or irq_domain
>> hopefully for 3.11
>
> ok. It means it is currently deprecated.
> I just wanted to be sure that I understand it correctly.
It's deprecated for platform_devices, but should still be used for
other bus types that don't provide the device driver with a list of
irqs. For platform devices it is best to use the platform_bus irq
table since that is portable regardless of how the device is
instantiated.
As for not exporting of_irq_count(), I don't have a problem with it,
but only if there is a user. It sounds like with the rework you
discussed with Jean-Christophe that it is no longer the case.
g.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists