[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 6 Jun 2013 13:24:57 +0100
From: "luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@...il.com>
To: Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com>
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
Linux on small ARM machines
<arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>,
devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
Stephen Warren <swarren@...dotorg.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
debian-arm@...ts.debian.org,
"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:01 AM, Tomasz Figa <tomasz.figa@...il.com> wrote:
> I don't see any other solution here than moving all the Allwinner code to
> DT (as it has been suggested in this thread several times already), as
> this is the only hardware description method supported by ARM Linux.
i repeat again: please state, explicitly and unequivocably that you -
linux kernel developers - are happy that the reach of linux and
gnu/linux OSes is dramatically reduced due to this intransigent
position.
or, tomasz, please state that you, tomasz, represent each and every
one of the linux kernel developers so that i do not need to keep
asking.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists