[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Thu, 06 Jun 2013 14:51:18 +0200
From: Vladimir Pantelic <vladoman@...il.com>
To: Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk>
CC: devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
debian-arm@...ts.debian.org,
"jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>,
ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org
Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re:
Uploading linux (3.9.4-1))
luke.leighton wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:19 AM, Henrik Nordström
> <henrik@...riknordstrom.net> wrote:
>> tor 2013-06-06 klockan 00:54 +0100 skrev luke.leighton:
>>
>>> > Not really the case. Actually the opposite. DT have this as well, and
>>> > integrated in device probing. Allwinner need to hack every driver used
>>> > to add their gpio requests to have pinmuxing triggered.
>>>
>>> augh. ok. solutions. what are the solutions here?
>>
>> What I said before.
>
> idea: hook into devicetree gpio functions to allow script-fex gpio
> functions to gain access in a separate module? that sort of thing.
>
>> Go with DT for the kernel. There is no need for two configuration
>> mechanisms doing the same thing. Disguise it in fex form (and
>> translator) if too hard for people with a DOS editior to configure.
>
> what methods for doing that. i need proposals. 4 days on the clock.
4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel
community work?
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists