lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 06 Jun 2013 22:19:24 +0200
From:	"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...k.pl>
To:	Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>
Cc:	Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, Betty Dall <betty.dall@...com>,
	Chen Gong <gong.chen@...ux.intel.com>,
	"Pearson, Greg" <greg.pearson@...com>,
	Huang Ying <ying.huang@...el.com>,
	"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
	"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/6] PCI/ACPI: Move AER severity defines to aer.h

On Thursday, June 06, 2013 01:28:28 PM Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 12:23 PM, Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com> wrote:
> > On Thu, 2013-06-06 at 12:10 -0600, Betty Dall wrote:
> >> The function aer_recover_queue() is a public interface and the
> >> severity argument uses #defines that are in the private header
> >> pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.h.
> >>
> >> This patch moves the #defines from pci/pcie/aer/aerdrv.h to
> >> include/linux/aer.h.
> > []
> >> diff --git a/include/linux/aer.h b/include/linux/aer.h
> > []
> >> -extern void cper_print_aer(const char *prefix, struct pci_dev *dev,
> >> +void cper_print_aer(const char *prefix, struct pci_dev *dev,
> >>                          int cper_severity, struct aer_capability_regs *aer);
> >
> > Can you please also realign the arguments on subsequent
> > lines to the open parenthesis of the first line and reflow
> > then to 80 cols when appropriate?
> 
> I can do this when I apply them, so don't bother reposting unless you
> have more substantive changes to make.

For the record, I have no objections against this patchset.

Thanks,
Rafael


-- 
I speak only for myself.
Rafael J. Wysocki, Intel Open Source Technology Center.
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ