lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:	Thu, 6 Jun 2013 16:48:32 -0700
From:	Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>
To:	Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
Cc:	Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>,
	Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
	cgroups@...r.kernel.org, Frederic Weisbecker <fweisbec@...il.com>,
	devel@...nvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 07/11] sched: account guest time per-cgroup as well.

On Wed, May 29, 2013 at 03:03:18PM +0400, Glauber Costa wrote:
> We already track multiple tick statistics per-cgroup, using
> the task_group_account_field facility. This patch accounts
> guest_time in that manner as well.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Glauber Costa <glommer@...nvz.org>
> CC: Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@...llo.nl>
> CC: Paul Turner <pjt@...gle.com>
> ---
>  kernel/sched/cputime.c | 10 ++++------
>  1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/cputime.c b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> index 74a44ef..e653e52 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/cputime.c
> @@ -183,8 +183,6 @@ void account_user_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
>  static void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
>  			       cputime_t cputime_scaled)
>  {
> -	u64 *cpustat = kcpustat_this_cpu->cpustat;
> -
>  	/* Add guest time to process. */
>  	p->utime += cputime;
>  	p->utimescaled += cputime_scaled;
> @@ -193,11 +191,11 @@ static void account_guest_time(struct task_struct *p, cputime_t cputime,
>  
>  	/* Add guest time to cpustat. */
>  	if (TASK_NICE(p) > 0) {
> -		cpustat[CPUTIME_NICE] += (__force u64) cputime;
> -		cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST_NICE] += (__force u64) cputime;
> +		task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_NICE, (__force u64) cputime);
> +		task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_GUEST, (__force u64) cputime);
>  	} else {
> -		cpustat[CPUTIME_USER] += (__force u64) cputime;
> -		cpustat[CPUTIME_GUEST] += (__force u64) cputime;
> +		task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_USER, (__force u64) cputime);
> +		task_group_account_field(p, CPUTIME_GUEST, (__force u64) cputime);

This is a behavior change, right?  It seems sane to me but maybe the
patch description should be more explicit?

Thanks.

-- 
tejun
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ