[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date: Wed, 05 Jun 2013 20:41:01 -0700
From: Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
To: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@...il.com>
CC: Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Rusty Russell <rusty@...tcorp.com.au>,
Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...atus.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org,
"Luis R. Rodriguez" <mcgrof@....qualcomm.com>,
Jouni Malinen <jouni@....qualcomm.com>,
Vasanthakumar Thiagarajan <vthiagar@....qualcomm.com>,
Senthil Balasubramanian <senthilb@....qualcomm.com>,
linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org, ath9k-devel@...ema.h4ckr.net,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: stop_machine lockup issue in 3.9.y.
On 06/05/2013 08:26 PM, Eric Dumazet wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-06-05 at 20:14 -0700, Tejun Heo wrote:
>
>>
>> Ah, so, that's why it's showing up now. We probably have had the same
>> issue all along but it used to be masked by the softirq limiting. Do
>> you care to revive the 10 iterations limit so that it's limited by
>> both the count and timing? We do wanna find out why softirq is
>> spinning indefinitely tho.
>
> Yes, no problem, I can do that.
Limiting it to 5000 fixes my problem, so if you wanted it larger than 10, that would
be fine by me.
I can send a version of my patch easily enough if we can agree on the max number of
loops (and if indeed my version of the patch is acceptable).
Thanks,
Ben
--
Ben Greear <greearb@...delatech.com>
Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists