| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAPweEDwR_NWUSi-j53m8MuoaV1RxM4wNNXtRioa2CjNdYqEtzQ@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 7 Jun 2013 08:40:41 +0100 From: "luke.leighton" <luke.leighton@...il.com> To: Linux on small ARM machines <arm-netbook@...ts.phcomp.co.uk> Cc: devicetree-discuss <devicetree-discuss@...abs.org>, Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, debian-arm@...ts.debian.org, "jonsmirl@...il.com" <jonsmirl@...il.com>, ARM Linux Mailing List <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, debian-kernel@...ts.debian.org Subject: Re: [Arm-netbook] getting allwinner SoC support upstream (was Re: Uploading linux (3.9.4-1)) On Thu, Jun 6, 2013 at 1:51 PM, Vladimir Pantelic <vladoman@...il.com> wrote: > 4 days? WTF? since when did setting an ultimatum to the kernel > community work? i was only informed of the opportunity 2 days ago, vladimir. this is an important meeting. of course the linux kernel community is entirely free to: * completely ignore this opportunity * continue to complain that soc vendors do not follow their unilaterally-decided rules * to continue to its chosen course of making unilateral decisions and setting unilaterally-decided rules and to experience the consequences. i'm extremely busy, vladimir, and i'm acting as the messenger here. 3 days remaining on the clock. l. -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to majordomo@...r.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists